Winter Meetings officially jump the shark

Many would have argued that the Winter Meetings jumped the shark a couple of years ago, specifically whenever MLB.com first came up with a special logo to brand their Winter Meetings coverage.

But I’m pretty certain the shark was actually jumped about a half hour ago, when AOL Fanhouse writer Ed Price tweeted that he heard a rumor the Mets had acquired Edwin Jackson.

Twitter nearly imploded. Every Mets fan and blogger weighed in, and numerous perplexed members of the New York media scrambled to find out if it was true.

I know this, of course, because they were all Twittering about it, too.

Then Price himself, only a few minutes later, clarified his Tweet, writing:

To be clear: #Mets and Edwin Jackson not confirmed. Heard in the lobby

Ah yes. It was Ed Price in the lobby with the cell phone.

But you can’t really blame the guy, I mean, after all, he had a reliable source: He heard it in the lobby.

Now, I have no idea who broke the news to Price, but I’m enjoying imagining that it was some guy who recognized how funny it would be to loudly spread false gossip.

My friends and I used to do this all the time: One time we had a loud discussion at a basketball game about Clyde Drexler’s mysterious death (note: No disrespect to Clyde the Glide, it was completely made up), and by the time we exited the arena, we overheard other people discussing it.

So if you’re in Indianapolis this week, I strongly urge you to consider standing in the lobby of the convention center, loudly forwarding nonsense. If anyone calls you on it, say it’s performance art. Trust me; that excuse always works.

To be fair to Price, it’s not really his fault that he desperately Tweeted the rumor from the lobby without investigating further. That, much like Tiger Woods’ extramarital affairs, should be blamed on the relentless news-media environment.

Shinjo succeeds where Norm MacDonald couldn’t

Reader Takashi sent in a couple more links to video of Tsuyoshi Shinjo doing stuff, and since my post containing Shinjo video from early November remains one of this site’s most popular, I figured I’d give the people what they want.

Here’s what it looks like when Tsuyoshi Shinjo wins the Japanese version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?:

And here’s… I don’t know what this is. It appears to be some sort of game show focusing on batting cages. The Shinjo reveal at about 3:00 in is pretty magical. If someone speaks Japanese and can explain to me why he’s wearing a surgical mask on his chin, I’d be hugely appreciative.

Dithering?

Adam Rubin provides a nice roundup of the issues facing the Mets at the Winter Meetings in this morning’s Daily News.

It’s a reasonable assessment of the Mets’ needs and what Omar Minaya is and should be doing. One sentence gave me pause, though:

While the Mets dither, Chone Figgins (not a power threat, but a left field candidate) is headed to Seattle. And Marlon Byrd soon will be off the board, too.

“Dithering,” as detailed by Dave Tomar in this Perpetual Post piece from not too long ago, became a popular word recently among critics of Barack Obama — most notably Dick Cheney — to describe his inaction in Afghanistan.

Rubin’s use of the verb could have been coincidental or tongue-in-cheek, but, given his very public history with Minaya, it’s certainly curious. “Dithering,” after all, connotes timid indecisiveness, and there’s no prior evidence presented in Rubin’s news article to suggest the team lacks a plan or is sitting around wondering what to while players like Figgins and Byrd fly off the board.

That could very well be the case, of course, but the Mets should absolutely not be criticized for allowing Figgins (at four years and $36 million) and Byrd get away. Neither is a perfect fit for the team — neither even really addresses the needs Rubin states in the feature — so the Mets were appropriately inactive.

Beyond that, there’s really no negative fallout from “dithering” at this point in the offseason. The Mets have until March to put together the best roster possible. And patience could be a good thing.

Nullius in verba

The Winter Meetings start today and, coincidentally, the Times ran this piece from Mary Jo Murphy on Saturday. It opens with the motto of Britain’s 350-year old science fraternity, the Royal Society:

“Take no one’s word for it,” or, in Latin, “Nullius in verba.”

I feel like that’s probably the best approach for fans following the Winter Meetings at their computer screens, as I am.

A few things will happen, and many, many more things will not happen.

Rumors will be developed, disseminated, then dispelled.

I’ll do my best to sift through the nonsense as best as I can here, and weigh in on whatever rumors I hear that I feel like weighing in on.

What I won’t attempt here, though, is the aggregation of every the rumor I hear surrounding the locals. That, in the first Winter Meetings following the mainstream media’s introduction to Twitter, seems like a fool’s errand.

The Winter Meetings are fun, though, because we love to speculate about what teams could do. That is, after all, why they’ve become such a media event: They are great for Web traffic, because baseball fans can’t get enough of the rumor mill.

My point is just to go forward skeptically, as the Royal Society would. Try to trace back everything you read — here or anywhere else — to its original source, and try to pay close attention to the language being used.

Items of note

Sam Page at Amazin’ Avenue recaps his time at the Winter Meetings in 2007. The villain? You guessed it: Steve Phillips.

Former catcher Joe Janish weighs in on the reports that the Mets’ catchers were to blame for their awful pitching last year.

The biggest news of the Winter Meetings so far? MetsBlog has a new look.

Now Tiger Woods’ ridiculous cavalcade of mistresses includes a porn star. Hint to professional athletes: If you’re looking to keep your extramarital affairs discreet, it’s probably best to avoid porn stars. Turns out they’re not shy about making their sex lives public.