About that right-handed bat

According to MLB Trade Rumors, Ryan Garko could be non-tendered by the San Francisco Giants.

If the Mets are really looking for a right-handed bat to complement Daniel Murphy at first base and are unwilling to give Nick Evans a shot, Garko might be a nice fit.

Garko will turn 29 in January and sports a career .887 OPS against lefties. He’s not a great defensive first baseman, but on the upside, he wears high socks and vaguely resembles Gaston from Beauty and the Beast.

Garko started 10 games in corner outfield positions last season. Also, my wife thinks he’s hot. I think he’s kind of goony looking, but there’s no accounting for taste I suppose.

Culture Jammin’: Mark McGrath

I’ve been so caught up in Winter Meetings nonsense this week that I’ve been totally remiss in weighing in on non-baseball nonsense.

Mark McGrath, in case you’re unfamiliar, is Sugar Ray.

You might argue that technically Mark McGrath is just the lead singer of the band Sugar Ray, but as my colleague Dave Tomar has pointed out at the Perpetual Post, Mark McGrath is quite obviously Sugar Ray. It’s pretty much indisputable.

You probably remember Sugar Ray from cheesy pop-rock hits like “Fly” and “Every Morning,” intolerable songs your high-school girlfriend made you listen to over and over again that one summer until you finally broke up with her because you couldn’t take it anymore.

OK, she dumped you because you didn’t look enough like Mark McGrath, but whatever, the songs sucked.

Anyway, one mildly interesting thing about Sugar Ray is that apparently before the breakout success of “Fly,” they made some pretty decent music. I didn’t listen to it, so I can’t really vouch for this, but my former roommate was a big pre-“Fly” Sugar Ray guy and used to defend them all the time, citing their debut album Lemonade and Brownies. I’m pretty sure he even played it for me, and though I can’t say I remember it, I support it in principle.

And apparently “Fly” was the only song on that album that sounded like “Fly.” Then the next album came out and every song sounded like “Fly.”

Whatever. So they sold out. A lot of bands sell out. It’s far from the most interesting thing about Mark McGrath.

By far the most interesting thing about Mark McGrath is that Mark McGrath knows absolutely everything about music. Seriously. Mark McGrath was on VH1’s celebrity Rock and Roll Jeopardy! a bunch of times and was completely dominant.

If I recall correctly, one time he was up by so much that they had to randomly award 500 dollars (I believe they were actually “points” in this case, because the proceeds were going to charity) to each of his opponents so they could even hold a Final Jeopardy!. Otherwise, it would have been just Mark McGrath, alone on the stage for the end of the show, because the other two guys were both in the red when Double Jeopardy! ended.

Also — and this is hazy — I’m pretty sure at one point the correct answer was actually the name of a soap opera that one of McGrath’s opponents was on at the time, at which point McGrath turned to the guy and said something like, “I think you better take this one, buddy.”

Then the guy still got it wrong before McGrath chimed in and got the points.

Honestly, I watch Jeopardy! in every form whenever it’s on, and I’ve never seen a contestant as outstanding as Mark McGrath was on celebrity Rock and Roll Jeopardy!.

And yet Mark McGrath chooses to make songs like “Someday.”

He knows about Stevie Wonder’s back catalog and the Buzzcocks’ greatest hits and the pioneers of New Age music, and he chooses to make bland adult contemporary radio pop.

I can’t determine if that’s depressing or hilarious or damning or what.

What happened here?

One of the more bizarre events of the Winter Meetings flew under the radar yesterday when the Mets diverted headlines with contract offers to Bengie Molina and Jason Bay.

The Rule 5 Draft is often meaningless and I am far from an expert in the subject, but it is a reasonable place to find a low-cost role-player, provided you’re willing to keep him on your 25-man roster. If not, you must send him back to the team from which you’ve taken him. That’s how it works.

Anyway, strange things were afoot yesterday. As I wrote:

The Mets took Carlos Monasterios from the Phillies in the Rule 5 Draft this morning. It’s not a big deal, but the Phillies only had 33 men on their 40-man roster so weren’t even close to protecting Monasterios, plus he didn’t even make the list of 14 guys Jonathan Mayo suggested at MLB.com, plus he only threw seven innings about Single A last season, plus this guy was available. The Mets must really like something about Monasterios, in other words.

Update, 10:02 a.m. And apparently Monasterios has been traded to the Dodgers for cash considerations.

It turned out, according to David Lennon, that scouts loved Monasterios, so there’s that. But enough to make up for the fact that he’d only thrown seven innings above Single A? I guess so. And no one even selected Yohan Pino, a guy who posted over a 4:1 K:BB ratio in over 120 innings across Double-A and Triple-A in 2009.

Shows what I know.

Anyway, the bottom line is the Mets, with 40-man roster spots available, turned the seventh overall pick in the Rule 5 draft — a solid opportunity to find a role player on the cheap — into cash considerations from the Dodgers.

It could be that the deal forebodes some future move with the Dodgers and was some sort of good faith move between the two clubs, as Lennon suggests. I have no idea.

In any case, it doesn’t mean much. But it’s certainly weird.

You bring up a good point, Joel Sherman

I was going to write a whole SNY.tv column about something, then Joel Sherman sort of scooped me. In today’s Post, he writes:

Ticket sales are lagging and fans are screaming for the Mets to make a meaningful acquisition.

And, poof, they suddenly were acknowledging making an offer yesterday to Jason Bay.

That’s a bit more cynical than the angle I was going to take, but the point is similar: We spend a ton of time weighing in on and reacting to reports from anonymous sources, but we almost never consider the motivations of anonymous sources.

Yesterday, after the Yankees had acquired Curtis Granderson, when Mets fans were starting to get impatient, after Scott Boras essentially called the Mets out in public, someone leaked word to Mike Francesa that an offer had been extended to Jason Bay.

Mike Francesa! You don’t leak information to Mike Francesa as a gesture of goodwill or good faith to a reporter who covers the team in good conscience every day, you leak information to Mike Francesa because it’s easier than standing on top of the Empire State Building shouting it into a 50-million watt megaphone while Twittering it into a Blackberry synchronized with a team of skywriting biplanes and the Goodyear blimp.

For whatever reason, the Mets desperately wanted us to know that they made an offer to Jason Bay.

I can think of a few possible explanations:

They really want Bay. Occam’s razor, right? The simplest explanation is often the best. The Mets could really believe that Bay’s power will play at Citi Field or that he’ll be a better value than Holliday, and so they are legitimately pursuing him and want their anxious fanbase to know it.

What Sherman says. By all accounts, ticket sales are slow. The Daily News has fueled a ton of paranoia that the Mets will not spend much money this offseason, so it could be that the team is extending offers to show fans that it is, indeed, willing to spend to improve this year. Bay pretty clearly is not going to accept the four-year, $65 million deal, since it’s only nominally larger than the one he was reportedly offered by the Red Sox, so it could very well be just for appearances.

They really want Holliday. If the deal is disingenuous, as Sherman seems to suggest, it could just as easily be an attempt to leverage perceived interest in Bay to drive down Matt Holliday’s price tag. I have no idea that that’s the case, and that’s probably wishful thinking on my part since I think Holliday’s a better fit, plus I think Scott Boras is probably too smart for that to work, but you never know.

Anyway as I’m writing this about six other blog posts have come out on the Internet wondering exactly the same thing about the motiviations, so apparently it’s not nearly as brilliant a realization as I initially assumed. Carry on.

Items of note

I’ve been avoiding this Tiger Woods nonsense altogether, but this is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read.

Buddy Jake Rake argues that Baseball Prospectus has jumped the shark, and inspires debate at Baseball Think Factory.

Tom Verducci says the Phillies could land Roy Halladay. I know this is terrifying for Mets fans, but keep in mind that they’ll have to gut their farm system and sign him to a longterm extension to do so. It’d be very, very bad for the next couple of years, though.

Kerry Rhodes should take out his frustration on an opposing player, or at least wrap up on a tackle. I don’t understand why the Jets owe him anything beyond his paycheck. Eric Smith can actually tackle people, and so deserves to start.